by Salman Khan
Many backward countries face major challenges in terms of land resources. Without proper management, distribution, and accounting of operations, millions of hectares of land are widely publicized. In most African countries, in particular, the federal government has traditions or local chefs. It does not affect land management as much as the federal government. At the same time, the instability of the current government in creating opportunities for technological advancement can alleviate this problem.
The ground system, which is a problem facing many countries in governance. Bad documents, incorrect signatures, and vague documents make it difficult to track down landlords. In addition, it is difficult for these governments to build foundation for their citizens. The disadvantage of preventing central organizations from tackling this issue is the lack of trust between the people and the people in these centers. Injured officers often take bribes and tamper with records.
In addition, the government does not have the supplies to manage large-scale projects unless it receives a large amount of funding. In addition, most citizens do not trust NGOs and do not get all the opportunities.
For such a national issue, removal from the center is the only option, as there is a lot of mistrust in the central office. What has this decentralized approach got to do with it? With proof, control of document ownership only establishes a link between the user and the mixed document. By combining addresses with mixed documents, users can send digital signs to prove holding. Because all the title documents of the blocked document are publicly available, they are not publicly available and cannot be returned. It also has boundaries concentration because it does not specify the name of the institution.
Like bitcoins that can be exchanged between users through UTXO, smart contracts can be transferred to the ground. However, it is important to consider how this affects locking and others that connect real data to digital data.
Blockchain is ideal for managing internal data through public control. However, you cannot enter the real world and control access. The output is as good as the input. If real-world information is incorrect, the results will be incorrect.
However, as you might have guessed, it centralizes us if someone is stuck providing the right information and information. This requires a reliable third party.
Georgia, Sweden, and Ukraine are trying to establish a decentralized Oracle system with land rights companies. The government will have to make significant policy changes to make important investments in governance and transform land organization into a blockchain platform.